Binance ឆ្លើយតបទៅនឹងការចោទប្រកាន់នៃការផ្លាស់ប្តូររាប់ពាន់លាននៅក្នុងមូលនិធិរបស់អតិថិជន

• As per a Forbes report, the corporation allegedly moved $1.8 billion in assets belonging to its customers.
• Moving money across wallets is common and poses no problems, according to Binance’s CSO.

ការផ្លាស់ប្តូរ cryptocurrency ដ៏ធំបំផុតនៅលើពិភពលោក, Binance, has refuted a Forbes article alleging that the company shifted $1.8 billion related to its users’ assets.

នេះបើយោងតាមសារព័ត៌មាន Forbes ។ Binance “quietly” shifted $1.8 billion deposited “as collateral intended to secure its customers’ stablecoins” between August 17 and early December 2022, leaving many of its users with unbacked cash. 

According to Patrick Hillman, chief strategy officer of Binance, moving money across wallets is normal and not an issue. Because “there are wallets and a ledger,” Hillman claimed, “there was no mixing.”

The allegations against Binance

Forbes stated that កាក់ USD [USDC] tokens, the stablecoin created by Circle, were used to steal $1.1 billion from clients and send it to Cumberland/DWR, a high-frequency trading firm based in Chicago. To convert the collateral into its own Binance Dollar [BUSD] stablecoin, the corporation “may have supported Binance in its efforts.”

According to Forbes, Binance provided hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to other significant players in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. This included Justin Sun’s TRON [TRX], Sam Bankman-Fried’s Alameda Research, and the Amber Group. They stated:

"យោងទៅតាមទិន្នន័យ blockchain ដែលត្រូវបានពិនិត្យដោយ Forbes ចាប់ពីថ្ងៃទី 17 ខែសីហាដល់ដើមខែធ្នូ - អំពីពេលវេលាដូចគ្នាដែល FTX ត្រូវបាន imploding - អ្នកកាន់ crypto ច្រើនជាង $ 1 ពាន់លានដុល្លារដែលគេស្គាល់ថា B-peg USDC tokens ត្រូវបានទុកចោលដោយគ្មានវត្ថុបញ្ចាំសម្រាប់ឧបករណ៍ដែល Binance បានអះអាងថានឹង ត្រូវ​បាន​គាំទ្រ 100% ដោយ​សញ្ញា​សម្គាល់​ណា​មួយ​ដែល​ពួក​គេ​ត្រូវ​បាន​ដាក់​បញ្ចូល​ទៅ។"

Forbes claimed that Binance imitated FTX’s pre-bankruptcy moves by similarly manipulating its clients’ money. According to US authorities, FTX allegedly paid money to Alameda Research despite it being against the law.

ការឆ្លើយតបរបស់ការផ្លាស់ប្តូរ

In response to Forbes’ charges of improper handling of user funds, Binance said there had been no misconduct. The company’s spokesman confirmed that the in-question transactions were a part of their internal billing procedures. Moreover, they had no bearing on the collaterization of user assets. The firm stated:

"ខណៈពេលដែល Binance ធ្លាប់បានទទួលស្គាល់ថាដំណើរការគ្រប់គ្រងកាបូបសម្រាប់វត្ថុបញ្ចាំ Binance-pegged token មិនតែងតែមានកំហុសនោះទេ នៅពេលណាដែលវត្ថុបញ្ចាំនៃទ្រព្យសម្បត្តិរបស់អ្នកប្រើប្រាស់ត្រូវបានប៉ះពាល់។ ដំណើរការសម្រាប់គ្រប់គ្រងកាបូបវត្ថុបញ្ចាំរបស់យើងត្រូវបានជួសជុលលើមូលដ្ឋានរយៈពេលវែង ហើយនេះអាចផ្ទៀងផ្ទាត់បានតាមខ្សែសង្វាក់។

The actions taken by Binance to mitigate the effects of the negative press are not insignificant. The exchange has been involved in several circumstances that have damaged its reputation. Notably, the CEO of FTX accused the CEO of Binance of planning the demise of his exchange, and there was controversy when Binance failed to collateralize its BUSD stablecoin by up to $1 billion.

After years in which reserves were combined with customer funds and at least one significant stablecoin, Binance-peg BUSD was not always completely supported. Binance recently announced it was switching to a semi-automated procedure for managing the reserves of its tokens.