អ្នកចុះហត្ថលេខាលើសញ្ញាប័ណ្ណ SBF បានបង្ហាញថាជាអតីតមហាវិទ្យាល័យ Stanford ។ ចៅក្រមក្ស័យធន FTX ចេញច្បាប់ប្រឆាំងនឹងការស៊ើបអង្កេត

ការវិវឌ្ឍន៍គួរឱ្យកត់សម្គាល់ចំនួនពីរទាក់ទងនឹងក្រុមហ៊ុនគ្រីបតូដែលក្ស័យធន FTX និងអតីតនាយកប្រតិបត្តិរបស់ខ្លួនគឺលោក Sam Bankman-Fried បានកើតឡើងនៅក្នុងតុលាការនៅថ្ងៃទី 15 ខែកុម្ភៈ។

Stanford members signed SBF bail bond

កាលពីមុន ចៅក្រម Lewis Kaplan បានអនុញ្ញាតឱ្យបុគ្គលពីរនាក់ដែលបានចុះហត្ថលេខាលើសញ្ញាប័ណ្ណនៅក្រៅឃុំរបស់លោក Sam Bankman-Fried ត្រូវបានកំណត់អត្តសញ្ញាណជាសាធារណៈក្នុងអំឡុងពេលសវនាការព្រហ្មទណ្ឌរបស់គាត់។

ឯកសារតុលាការថ្ងៃនេះ បានបង្ហាញថា អ្នកចុះហត្ថលេខាលើសញ្ញាប័ណ្ណទាំងនោះ (ឬអ្នកធានា) គឺជាអ្នកវិទ្យាសាស្ត្រស្រាវជ្រាវជាន់ខ្ពស់របស់សាកលវិទ្យាល័យ Stanford និងជាអតីតព្រឹទ្ធបុរសច្បាប់ Stanford ដែលបានចុះហត្ថលេខាលើសញ្ញាប័ណ្ណ $200,000 និងសញ្ញាប័ណ្ណ $500,000 រៀងគ្នា។

Bankman-Fried’s parents are professors at Stanford University. In comments to Coindesk, the former dean said that his friendship with the family was the reason he posted bail.

Bankman-Fried asked for the two bond signatories to remain private on ថ្ងៃទី ១៥ ខែមករា. The judge approved the reveal of their identities on ថ្ងៃទី ១៥ ខែមករា, but Bankman-Fried was given time to file an appeal. As a result, the identities of the signers were not disclosed until today.

FTX needs no further probe

នៅក្នុងនីតិវិធីក្ស័យធនដាច់ដោយឡែករបស់ FTX ចៅក្រម គ្រប់គ្រងនោះ។ ការស៊ើបអង្កេតឯករាជ្យបន្ថែមគឺមិនចាំបាច់ទេ ហើយបានបដិសេធសំណើរដើម្បីតែងតាំងអ្នកពិនិត្យឯករាជ្យ។

Judge John Dorsey said that appointing an independent examiner would cost tens of millions of dollars and would likely surpass $100 million. This, he said, would impose indirect costs on creditors (or former customers) by reducing their eventual compensation.

The judge noted that FTX’s replacement CEO, John Ray III, has appointed independent directors and experts with very little connection to FTX to look into the company’s past actions. He said that those parties are competent to take on the task.

Judge Dorsey decided that the established law does not require an examiner to be appointed and that the court can deny the appointment of an examiner.

The U.S. Department of Justice was behind initial calls for an examiner. The judge was undecided on whether to appoint an examiner as recently as ខែកុម្ភៈ 6.